Any clue what was the crypto software ?

This is a bad joke. Turkey desperately trying to keep journalists away from the
PKK (aka Rojava) because their government is a corrupt islamic fundimentalist
state and is beginning to lose territory to the PKK's Anarchist Revolution.
Conseptually, religious fundimentalism is a reaction to a corrupt and depraved
society but when even a religious state becomes corrupt, they have reached
the very bottom of moral bankrupcy.

It's hard not to laugh.

On 02/09/15 14:02, psy wrote:
>
>
> On 02/09/15 13:49, Sam wrote:
>> I wasn't saying something is wrong with GPG per say. But since you mention
>> it: The problem with GPG over email is really just the complication. It is not
>> easy enough for a child or granny so not everyone uses it. The protocol is
>> great, but needs to be merged into the messaging layer itself to solve the
>> problem I mention.
>>
>> What I was more taking about is email. Let us agree/work upon building a
>> unified p2p messaging standard to replace it. When standardized and started to
>> be implemented across p2p systems, it will win out because it is inherently
>> better in that it is private when no non p2p can be. It is uncensorable, Etc.
>> It can be spam resistant with POW, Etc.
>>
>> When the world relies on such a thing for everyday tasks, it will be more
>> difficult to take away encryption.
>
> I am totally agree about cotidianity.
>
> But looks, no only thinking on childs using encryption and more on
> create a more high previous privacy methods, my question is for example:
> What's happen with GPG encryption over mailing lists?.
>
> I mean, all this technologies (email, IRC..) looks good deployed by
> stacked on developments on time. Not only on the user friendly way.
>
> Another example is: Why we haven't a community browser (a python one,
> for example)?. Iceweasel comes with Debian (free software). And it
> starts to have ads.
>
> We are losing soberanity.... etc. etc... And we need to have it to win
> the battle of encryption.
>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 01:41:11 PM Otto Meier wrote:
>>> What is faulty with GPG ?
>>>
>>> On 02.09.2015, at 13:33, Sam <unsystem@???> wrote:
>>>> Agreed. We must make many common day things, like basic email, use
>>>> encryption software. And I'm not talking about GPG. I'm talking
>>>> inherently encrypted p2p messaging.
>>>>
>>>> Sam
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 01:28:01 PM psy wrote:
>>>>> Turkey official tells Al Jazeera charges made after fixer found to have
>>>>> encryption software used by ISIL on his laptop....
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/09/vice-news-fixer-arrested-encryption
>>>>> -so ftware-150901200622345.html
>>>>>
>>>>> ....
>>>>>
>>>>> It is increasingly clear that the world's governments see the encryption
>>>>> tool as a threat to the repression. I begin to see many similar news..
>>>>>
>>>>> In the following years they will try to ban it "legally" with the
>>>>> complicity of the manufacturers and big IT companies (that will
>>>>> implement ONLY in-secure encryption breakeable by secret agencies).
>>>>>
>>>>> We have to remember that 'encrypt' will be a crime shortly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe agood way to avoid this is to make more widespread encryption. If
>>>>> not, will be so easy to them recognize who is using encryption just
>>>>> sniffing traffic massively.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's your opinion?. Let's brainstorm some strategies...
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>