On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 13:39:28 +0100
Rainer Weikusat <rainerweikusat@???> wrote:

> Steve Litt <slitt@???> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:20:41 +0200
> > Laurent Bercot <ska-devel@???> wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/08/2015 23:11, Steve Litt wrote:
> >> > in my LUG, the most pro-systemd guys are the mega-metal admins
> >> > administering hundreds of boxes with hundreds of Docker
> >> > containers. These guys are telling me systemd is necessary to
> >> > efficiently manage the Dockers.
> >>
> >> They're telling you that because they've been brainwashed with
> >> that idea, and since it's working for them, they're too lazy to try
> >> anything else. But they're wrong. Alpine Linux, for instance, makes
> >> Docker containers a breeze to use, and makes the images a lot
> >> smaller. Alpine is runit-based, and people have also found success
> >> running Docker containers under s6; systemd is very unnecessary,
> >> and anyone pretending it is is either ignorant or malicious.
> >
> > This is very good information.
>
> Something else you might want to have a look at:
>
> http://www.ibuildthecloud.com/blog/2014/12/03/is-docker-fundamentally-flawed

Very nice!


SteveT

Steve Litt
August 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts
http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust