:: Re: [Squatconf] Consensus
Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: squatconf
Fecha:  
A: squatconf
Asunto: Re: [Squatconf] Consensus
That is what Stella claimed to do, I didn't read the whole paper (39 pages)
so I can't claim to be an expert on it though.
On Aug 24, 2015 8:04 AM, "squatconf--- via Squatconf" <
squatconf@???> wrote:

> Does anybody know of any good electorial / consensus protocols which have
> the property of scaling fliudly from a few users to hundreds or thousands
> (or more) ?
> _______________________________________________
> Squatconf mailing list
> Squatconf@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squatconf
>