On Fri, 8/14/15, Steve Litt <slitt@???> wrote:

Subject: Re: [DNG] Systemd Shims
To: dng@???
Date: Friday, August 14, 2015, 7:26 PM

On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 14:49:17 -0700

Go Linux <golinux@???> wrote:

> On Fri, 8/14/15, T.J. Duchene <t.j.duchene@???> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [DNG] Systemd Shims
> To: dng@???
> Date: Friday, August 14, 2015, 2:47 PM
>>
>> > I know not everyone here agrees with me, especially Steve, and
>> > that's perfectly okay. I have no problem with that at all. I just
>> > don't see "System 5 pure" as realistic when planning ahead looking
>> > at a maintenance standpoint when Debuan upstream is more and more
>> > likely to stick with Systemd in designing their packaging.
>> >
>>
>> Maybe we should just put Steve in charge of decontaminating all
>> packages with systemd deps!
>
> Oh, you wouldn't want to do that. Contrary to what I wrote in another
> thread about "the perfect is the enemy of the good", if *I* were in
> charge of decontamination, I'd throw out whole subsystems. Gnome gone.
> KDE gone. Xfce gone. Networkmanager gone. Gimp gone if it gets all
> systemd on us.
>

--------------------------------------------

Whoa! I suggested putting you in charge of decontaminating packages not deciding inclusion/exclusion policy! Actually the suggestion was more to pull your chain than anything else (and it worked didn't it). You're quite entertaining when you get wound up. :)

golinux