:: Re: [DNG] Congratulations to the De…
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: James Powell
日付:  
To: shraptor, dng
題目: Re: [DNG] Congratulations to the Devuan team
I'm just waiting for vdev-0.1 to get published. :D

-Jim
________________________________
From: shraptor<mailto:shraptor@bahnhof.se>
Sent: ‎8/‎12/‎2015 4:13 AM
To: dng@???<mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [DNG] Congratulations to the Devuan team

Vdev is now in a functional state and I use it on
my desktop everyday.

vdev is now doing everything I used udev for.

I however don't use it in initramfs where I use busybox mdev.

More testers would probably be good for more use-cases so
agreed now packaging would be desired.

But as I said before vdev(libudev-compat) + spacefm auto-detection of
plugged devices is working for me. I don't want automounting but I
believe it would be easy to setup with udevil!?


/Scooby


On 2015-08-12 12:48, James Powell wrote:
> We all know Devuan is going to create a huge ripple in the great big
> pond, and join the ranks of the pro-choicers in regards to software
> usage.
>
> While I'm following vdev closely, mostly to backport it to another
> distribution, Devuan's success will bring success to other choice
> giving distributions as well.
>
> It's a win-win situation finally.
>
> -Jim
>
> -------------------------
> From: tilt!
> Sent: ‎8/‎12/‎2015 3:39 AM
> To: dng@???
> Subject: [DNG] Congratulations to the Devuan team
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to convey my respect and appreciation to all
> participants,
> acknowledging that Devuan GNU/Linux is in use here now as a
> functional
> Linux Desktop which I use for tasks of software development and
> system
> integration as well as for everyday mail, office and web stuff.
>
> Good work! Keep it coming!
>
> I definately look forward to vdev. Currently I try to involve myself
> in testing it out a bit; it appears like a very elegant solution that
> opens many interesting possibilities. I also heard that there is a
> packaging effort, and I wonder how that is coming along.
>
> I admit that in spite of issues I expressed previously on this list,
> I currently use PolicyKit to enable some "administrative operations"
> when using the system via XFCE4, simply because it's currently the
> easiest way for me to do stuff like mounting hot-plugged disks or
> managing libvirt guests.
>
> But that clearly demonstrates the paradigm of "freedom of choice"
> being successfully implemented in Devuan, where I can now freely
> choose system components that serve my needs best.
>
> Kind regards,
> T.
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng [1]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@???
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng