"Devuan appears to want to stick to sysvinit for the initial release.
Afterwards however, is debatable...."

Yes, thank you for the clarification, maybe I wasn't clear.
After the first release was what I meant.



On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:42 PM, James Powell <james4591@???>
wrote:

> Devuan appears to want to stick to sysvinit for the initial release.
> Afterwards however, is debatable, but regardless, sanity in init is going
> to be probably prevalent.
>
> I too favor OpenRC as well as it is really a sane way to extend sysvinit.
> ------------------------------
> From: Antonio Trkdz.tab <antoniotrkdz@???>
> Sent: ‎7/‎21/‎2015 4:03 AM
> To: Dng@???
> Subject: [DNG] openRC
>

>      Dear List,

>
> I have been following your discussions with a lot of interest for quite a
> bit now.
> I really admire what you are doing as I really felt let down by Debian's
> decision to prevent people to have a choice.
>
> I am not a programmer and I consider myself an average user, I have been
> using Debian for years and I was very happy with it.
> I am using Wheezy right now and I am waiting for the stable release of
> Devuan to make the switch.
>
> I used Gentoo in the past and I remember that openRC was very easy to
> get used to and appeared to get the job done fairly well and neatly.
> Would it be useful to consider to adopt this system for forthcoming
> releases of Devuan, since it is a complement of sysvinit?
>
> This is just an humble thought from a non technical point of view, I
> hope you take it for what it is.
>
> Thank you all for your exceptional work.
>
> Antoniotrkdz
>
> P.S.: I am sorry if this question was already made in early
> conversations and I missed it.
>