On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:57:08PM -0700, James Powell wrote:
> An LTS branch isn't needed if you do version controlled releases and sponsor support for versioned releases for at least 3-4 versions back.

[cut]

>
> As releases mature, 1.0 would be maintained until the fourth or fifth release year following, then pastured, regardless of version number. The only time the main number should be changed is IF and ONLY IF glibc is updated, otherwise 1.0 would transmigrate to 1.1.
>
> How does that sound?
>

It sounds like Slackware, and there is a clear reason why I have been
using Debian and not Slackware. I believe that the
stable-testing-unstable-experimental organisation is working already
fine. We can discuss whether we have the possibility (and the
resources) to provide long-time support releases, but if you guys want
to make a Slackvuan, then don't count me in.

HND

KatolaZ

--
[ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ]
[ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ]
[ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ]