> On July 17, 2015 at 12:57 AM James Powell <james4591@???> wrote:
>
> An LTS branch isn't needed if you do version controlled releases and sponsor
> support for versioned releases for at least 3-4 versions back.
>
> To be fair, I've used Slackware long enough to see how maintaining a versioned
> release can go right, and seen enough of Ubuntu to see how it can go horribly
> wrong.
>
> Devuan should have at least 3 branches.

This is not for Devuan 1.0 but I wonder if there is a clever way to use Linux
containers to allow a mix of versioned/unstable/experimental for individual
packages and their dependencies?

I am speaking as one who is about to jump into LXC but has no expertise about it
yet.

Peter Olson