Not really, don´t forget what Linus said about dbus/kdbus:

"We don't merge kernel code just
because user space was written by a retarded monkey on crack. Kernel
code has higher standards..."

http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1506.2/05492.html

On 2015-07-02 02:31, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:21:46PM +0300, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
>> It's the second question:
>>
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/15/06/30/0058243/interviews-linus-torvalds-answers-your-question?utm_source=feedly1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
>>
>
> I wouldn't expect any different answer from Linus. And who wants to
> read anything like "hey, I would not allow kdbus in the kernel for all
> the gold in the world" in that answer should well remember that Linus
> has never shown any particular philosophical interest in Free Software
> or Open Source, since he is basically "motivated by technology" (as he
> says himself a few lines down, in another answer to another silly
> question).
>
> This means that if he will be sooner or later convinced that kdbus is
> a good piece of technology to have in the kernel, for one reason or
> another, he will merge it overnight, irrespective of the real or
> perceived madness and stubborness of its maintainers.
>
> I am afraid that kdbus/systemd people will lately grasp this simple
> bit of knowledge about Linus, and go for the compromise to convince
> him that kdbus is good and the people around it are not monsters. At
> that point they will have succeeded. And they will.
>
> HND
>
> KatolaZ

--
Stop slacking you lazy bum!