Then this without a doubt is clear evidence that kdbus is in fact a systemd proprietary IPC. Has anyone heard of any software otherwise that will use kdbus at all, even in the least?

Lennart is desperate to get kdbus in, but is making a critical error in judgment with this. No distribution has ever added software to the kernel that has been 3rd party via patch, or has limited function, other than Gentoo that maintains a patch for OpenRC. ZFSOnLinux has never been allowed, neither has Reiser4, or any other non-vanilla code, nor any code from Linux-next.

No package developer in their right mind would do such a lascivious addition to the kernel, nor would dare to.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen<mailto:arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Sent: ‎6/‎19/‎2015 10:23 AM
To: dng@???<mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>; Clarke Sideroad<mailto:clarke.sideroad@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DNG] We Must be Prepared ....

It does not make the kernel systems, but its presence might make some
poorly written program think systems is present. But poor code assumes
things all the time, so really it will not make a difference.

Arnt
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@???
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng