Not exactly.

Eudev is free of systemd, but it shares nearly 99.5% of it's code base with systemd-udev, plus some minor fix ups from the Gentoo developers.

It's name technically means Extracted udev. You get the same udev if you build the systemd-udev with an extraction kit as eudev, minus the fix ups.

The only time eudev will become a true fork is when kdbus gets official, but no one is betting on it, nor holding our breath... yet.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Hendrik Boom<mailto:hendrik@topoi.pooq.com>
Sent: ‎5/‎14/‎2015 3:13 PM
To: dng@???<mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [Dng] A novice attempt to speed up Devuan development

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:15:50PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 12:15 -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
> > > I think the fact that I pointed out clearly shows that there is very good
> > > technical reason to exclude udev, unless you are willing to be the maintainer
> > > of udev outside systemd source tree in Devuan.
> >
>
> > The shortest and most reasonable route to release a stable 1.0 of
> > Devuan is to use udev for the present.
>
> See below.
>
> > Eudev might make a good
> > replacement, but udev is still the best candidate in terms of people
> > using it if you follow the principle that "eyes make bugs shallow".
>
> People are working _now_ on eudev as a replacement for udev until vdev
> is finished. It might even be a good replacement for udev already for
> the devuan jessie release. What do you do, except chat?

Isn't eudev actually the systemd-free fork of udev everyone is asking for?

-- hendrik
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@???
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng