On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:15:50PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 12:15 -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
> > > I think the fact that I pointed out clearly shows that there is very good
> > > technical reason to exclude udev, unless you are willing to be the maintainer
> > > of udev outside systemd source tree in Devuan.
> >
>
> > The shortest and most reasonable route to release a stable 1.0 of
> > Devuan is to use udev for the present.
>
> See below.
>
> > Eudev might make a good
> > replacement, but udev is still the best candidate in terms of people
> > using it if you follow the principle that "eyes make bugs shallow".
>
> People are working _now_ on eudev as a replacement for udev until vdev
> is finished. It might even be a good replacement for udev already for
> the devuan jessie release. What do you do, except chat?

Isn't eudev actually the systemd-free fork of udev everyone is asking for?

-- hendrik