:: Re: [Dng] A novice attempt to speed…
Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: James Powell
Data:  
A: Jaromil, Jaret Cantu
CC: dng@lists.dyne.org
Assumpte: Re: [Dng] A novice attempt to speed up Devuan development
Yes. Eudev should be the target goal for now until Jude can get vdev stabilized. There's also the aspect of using Busybox-mdev (mdev-like-a-boss project has a lot of insight on this for generalized usages) though this would forgo any allowances of evdev drivers for input devices and require the fallback individual input drivers.

> Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 10:29:59 +0200
> From: jaromil@???
> To: jaret@???
> CC: dng@???
> Subject: Re: [Dng] A novice attempt to speed up Devuan development
>
>
> dear Jaret,
>
> thanks for your information
>
> On Tue, 05 May 2015, Jaret Cantu wrote:
>
> > eudev continues to pull in relevant udev changes from the systemd
> > tree (without the init-specific filth, obviously) and even provides
> > some fixes of its own. It is like a window into some magical world
> > where udev development continues under the old banner. Well, a
> > similar banner that is one character wider, at least.
>
> if this is true, then eudev is a really good candidate for us to
> substitute udev and we should at least package it to see how it works,
> while still waiting for vdev to get to a stable state.
>
> I was never a fan of udev all the way and think that Jude's approach at
> redesigning is way better, yet eudev now is likely to be more stable if
> the above is true. I'm particularly interested by the fact they are
> backporting the updates in udev and even fixing some of them.
>
> can you provide examples in which this happened?
>
> just in case you have time, for us to better evaluate the option
>
> > The only difference I've really noticed with the last version of
> > udev before being cannibalized and eudev is that eudev doesn't build
> > against some old (pre-3.0) kernel headers. That's really only an
> > issue for crufty embedded targets, not desktops, tho'.
>
> well, there are a few of those, NAS and mediaplayers, that are actually
> widely distributed on the consumer market. Anyway I doubt they will
> upgrade anything to the point they'll ever need to defend themselves
> from the systemd avalanche.
>
> ciao
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng