Le 30/04/2015 01:27, Joerg Reisenweber a écrit :
> On Wed 29 April 2015 23:46:51 Didier Kryn wrote:
>> >They decided to put them on the second disk which contained user data
>> >and was therefore mounted at /usr
> AFAIK that's "Unix System Resources" or somesuch, not "User"

     Maybe it's true, but it sounds like an afterthought, mostly for the 
reason it is inacurate, because the most important Unix System Resources 
are NOT in this directory but in /bin, /sbin, /lib and /etc.

     I'm not saying it is illegitimate to try to give sense. People are 
now finding advantages in this configuration, which were not the 
original reason; why not also forge an acronym to give a sensible 
meaning to the name, different of the original meaning?

     Didier