On 15/04/15 18:39, Franco Lanza wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:22:28PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> systemd-shim is for when you *don't* want systemd.
> Yes, but cause of you have things that depend on components of systemd.
> We don't want systemd nor anything depending on components from systemd,
> so, we don't want the shim too.
>
> systemd-shim is for who don't want to have systemd in pid 1 but accept
> other systemd components. We don't want systemd at all.
>

That is exactly what I meant. Thanks Franco for explaining that differently.

Cheers,

Anto