On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:36:56PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> I simply think that at the moment energies could be spent in a more
> productive way than in trying to identify all the good technical
> aspects of systemd (which might indeed be numerous). We still don't
> have a systemd-free distribution, so I am sorry but I don't see the
> point of discussing about which aspect of systemd one would like to
> have in an otherwise systemd-free distribution
<snip>

To know the next project we need.
And to figure out how much of it needs to be a dropin ABI-compatible
replacement, how much should be conceptually similar, where we can reuse
something else, and how much serves as a warning to all comers not to go
that way.

We need to understand the strengths and caveats, the failings and the
bright spots.

Thanks,
Isaac Dunham