> When the organization has made a foundational policy decision, so they
> can move forward and implement that policy, yet somebody keeps trying
> to open up that policy to further debate, is that somebody's fire
> really friendly? Are they looking and fighting in the same direction,
> or are they deliberately retarding progress in that direction?
>

man, this is just getting depressing... I don't see anybody "trying to open
a policy to further debate" I just see a frank and open discussion of a
topic that is one way or the other important to all of us. What I am also
seeing is that "open debate" is actively discouraged by some people on this
list.