Jaromil,

>we struggle to have no systemd at all in Devuan,
>In the alpha releases there is *no systemd daemon running*

Thanks for clearing that up!

Linux O'Beardly
@LinuxOBeardly
http://o.beard.ly


On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Jaromil <jaromil@???> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Mark R. White <whitemr@???>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Just to be clear: I've seen a lot of cross talk about the
> > > possibility of systemd being put into Devuan via a sandbox or even
> > > having the systemd API written in. Is it safe to assume that going
> > > forward that there will be no systemd in Devuan? Because if there
> > > is, I'm in the wrong place.
> >
> > +1
>
> I am aware of the discussions, but I haven't followed them in detail
> because of lack of time.
>
> I can only repeat what we always wrote: we struggle to have no systemd
> at all in Devuan, with the implied advantages of better compatibility
> with BSD userspace, possibility to keep around uclibc, Hurd etc.
>
> If we have Systemd in the alpha release cycle is just because of a few
> desktop requirements and mostly the fact that udev now is incorporated
> in systemd (that's why vdev is very important to us).
>
> In the alpha releases there is *no systemd daemon running* so this is a
> first goal achieved. The systemd package is there and may stick around
> for a while until vdev is in good shape.
>
> ciao
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>