Le 23/03/2015 20:10, Nuno Magalhães a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Mark R. White<whitemr@???> wrote:
>> >
>> >Just to be clear: I've seen a lot of cross talk about the possibility of
>> >systemd being put into Devuan via a sandbox or even having the systemd API
>> >written in. Is it safe to assume that going forward that there will be no
>> >systemd in Devuan? Because if there is, I'm in the wrong place.
> +1
If I have given to anyone the impression I supported the
possibility for systemd to sneak into Devuan in some way, it was a false
impression; take it as a figure of style. My concern is that a piece of
software is not rejected because of its name or its author, but on well
advertized general grounds.
Didier