> > you are not a victim here. your videos were "terminated" because they
> > violated copyright law which they are required to enforce. apparently
> > you are a repeat offender and thus correctly deemed untrustworthy.
> You don't know that to be truth what you are claiming. And you are calling me
> a lier by saying that.
the link you posted links to a clip from Al Jazeera that was taken
down due to copyright infringement. you do realize that content from
Al Jazeera is copyright and that posting it without permission is
copyright infringement, right? if you do stuff like that repeatedly
they ban you. are you claiming you didn't post the videos and that
there is a conspiracy to oppress you? if so, you have a persecution
complex.
> And, just for the record, this is, IMO, enough from me in my defence.
i don't even know what you are defending. you gave me links to some
posts and i do not know what those are supposed to signify.
> For now let's try and discuss just these two of my queries.
make a new topic if you have a question.
- Gravis
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:59 PM, <miroslav.rovis1@???> wrote:
> This is textual representation from links -dump
> https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/thread/20150305.194152.e5e48ea9.en.html .
>
> ||M...|| Gravis 2015-03-05 05:22
> ||....M| Dr. Nikolaus Klepp 2015-03-05 08:04
> ||.....M Dr. Nikolaus Klepp 2015-03-05 08:11
> ||.....M Gravis 2015-03-05 08:28
> |M.....| shraptor shraptor 2015-03-05 11:06
> M......| Nuno Magalhaes 2015-03-05 13:04
> M......| Jaromil 2015-03-05 13:21
> M......| Nate Bargmann 2015-03-05 17:29
> .......M-\ miroslav.rovis1 2015-03-05 17:51
> .......M\| Martijn Dekkers 2015-03-05 19:41
> .......||M Gravis 2015-03-06 00:07
> .......M| miroslav.rovis1 2015-03-06 00:43
> .......|M Gravis 2015-03-06 01:09
> .......M Gravis 2015-03-06 01:12
>
> And the message from among the above that was not delivered to my mailbox is:
>
> .......||M Gravis 2015-03-06 00:07
>
> So I have to reply to it by constructing if from:
>
> https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20150306.000753.8bd4b265.en.html
>
> where I see it. I don't think there is an easy way to make it appear
> where it is due, in the right place in the thread linked above as shown
> in your mailboxes, such as if you use Mutt like me or other good mail
> client, kind Devuan members (or in this thread that some kind reader is
> reading from the web in the future). I mean I can make it appear where
> it's due, right after the message that it is a reply to.
>
> While it could be a fault in my system (there are threads about messages not
> showing in mutt-users mailing list), it is much more likely this is my dear
> regime's work. Seen such a lot of it to even expect it.
>
>>> Really? The Surveillance Engine Terminated All My Videos
>>> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=113059
>
>> you are not a victim here. your videos were "terminated" because they
>> violated copyright law which they are required to enforce. apparently
>> you are a repeat offender and thus correctly deemed untrustworthy.
>
> You don't know that to be truth what you are claiming. And you are calling me
> a lier by saying that. You're unnecessarily attacking me, just for your love
> of Google, which I don't have anything against, your love of Google, but here
> you're making their falsity to become truth, and without knowing, without
> having seen any of my videos to know whether they were in breach of copyright.
> And they were not!
>
>> your other comments pointing to forum posts are nebulous in meaning.
>
>> - Gravis
>
> Like Google and Yahoo sending mail from my machine, maybe?
>> >> a clickjacking that only packets captured show:
>> >> Postfix smtp/TLS, Bkp/Cloning Mthd, Censorship/Intrusion
>> >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-999436.html#7685200
>> >>
>
> Or like my Grsecurity tip, which is approaching 30,000 views?
>> >> Grsecurity/Pax installation on Debian GNU/Linux
>> >> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=108616
>> >>
>
> Or my new topic on dbus?
>> Updating and keeping your Gentoo non-poeterized
>> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1012022.html
>>
>
> Which of these three is nebulous to deserve disrespectful top posting of
> yours and taking my words out of context, so other members would not see my
> thought but your crippled representation of my thought
> (
> in the email of yours, where you cut this thought of mine:
>
>> > Well, I don't respond in kind. I was derided and attacked earlier in
>> > Debian Fora, but my topics and my tips ended up being read and
>> > followed. And they are in Gentoo Fora.
>
> to just:
>> > I was derided and attacked earlier in Debian Fora
>>
>> why am i not surprised? -_-
>
> )?
>
> And, just for the record, this is, IMO, enough from me in my defence. If
> either Martijn Dekkers or Gravis continue attacking me via offences, and
> false arguments and non-arguments, I have made my sufficient defence
> herewith.
>
> Pls., anyone, can we get any serious insight from somebody on topics
> that, some, can be read in the links above:
>
> the Grsecurity/Pax hardening of the kernel, will you think of it,
> instead of SELinux, or as an option besides SELinux? It sure will be
> attainable in the way I got it in Debian in that Tip, but official
> support would be so great!
>
> And an opt-out from dbus, official possiblity to have a non-dbus Devuan.
>
> For now let's try and discuss just these two of my queries.
> --
> Miroslav Rovis
> Zagreb, Croatia
> http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
::
Re: [Dng] Plan for Devuan to use Mo…
