> This way it would be much easier to count which
> release it is, and it would serve as an indication that devuan has
> already it's own personality, and isn't only a debian's copy.

that is a poor rationale for breaking a logical naming scheme.
--Gravis


On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:44 AM, P. T. Zoltowski <osyear@???> wrote:
> 2015-03-05 2:36 GMT+01:00, Ricardo Larrañaga <ricardo.larranaga@???>:
>> So, basically we will be using mithology for names. Ahead on the list it
>> gets a little more variety, but initially is mostly gods and godess
>
> Well, I think this is a good reminder. That even things people once
> thought as all powerful, always end up as a distant memory (in this
> case literally ;) ).
>
> I know it's probably too late for any suggestions, but I would change
> few things. I think Ceres should be the permanent name for testing
> repository, and unstable should be named Apophis (or after some other
> naughty planet). And the first realease I would name doubly (or rather
> triply), Jessie Ascii. This way it would be much easier to count which
> release it is, and it would serve as an indication that devuan has
> already it's own personality, and isn't only a debian's copy.