> > > I don't know. Given the entire NetworkManager's dependency on dbus,
> >
> > Dbus is just the mechanism other programs use to interact with NM.
> > If you were to carve out the dbus API from NM, it would still manage
> > your network as before, but you'd need to add a different way to
> > control it.
>
> For me it would be easier to build something simple from scratch than
> rip out and replace other peoples' code from something unfamiliar to me.

i think the implied message was that dbus is merely an IPC mechanism and
removing would simply result in replacing it with another and thus a
(mostly) moot point.

--Gravis

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Steve Litt <slitt@???>
wrote:

> On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:34:37 -0500
> Jude Nelson <judecn@???> wrote:
>
> > > I don't know. Given the entire NetworkManager's dependency on dbus,
> >
> > Dbus is just the mechanism other programs use to interact with NM.
> > If you were to carve out the dbus API from NM, it would still manage
> > your network as before, but you'd need to add a different way to
> > control it.
> >
> > -Jude
>
> :-)
>
> For me it would be easier to build something simple from scratch than
> rip out and replace other peoples' code from something unfamiliar to me.
>
> SteveT
>

> Steve Litt                *  http://www.troubleshooters.com/
> Troubleshooting Training  *  Human Performance

>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>