I have personnal feelings about which languages are productive and 
produce bug-free software and which, in the contrary let you waste your 
time in correcting your bugs and eventually produce wrong result without 
people even noticing. But I am afraid this leads to endless discussions.

     The choice of the language is yours and is absolutely respectable. 
And I am immensely gratefull to you for giving the result of your work 
to the community whatever the language.

     Just the following restriction: please, when your piece of software 
is first of all an API, like dbus is, let it be not too much 
language-oriented. I mean don't force other programmers to think like 
you, or, worse, don't make the API only usable by applications written 
in one language.

     Didier

> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:54:05PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
>>          Hey Guys, I would love to have a dispute about languages, but I
>>      don't think it's in the scope of this mailing list. Do you? Excuse
>>      me for having fed it.
> Off topic?  That's already been established, in a thread about what
> scripting lannguage to use for Devuan.  The conclusion there we
> use whatever the scripts were already written in on Debian, rather than
> rewriting everything.