Devuan is all about talk and process, nothing's been release, and you people pooh pooh longstanding useful security tools. You don't know what you're doing, except in the realm of rolling some euros into a blunt to smoke. So why not split the list up before you even have anything to show for it? I mean it's process and debate, the only thing you all are good at.

Fuck you Jack L. Frost. Fuck you for spitting on a good post-install script that has served us since 2001 known as Bastille-Linux. Fuck you for saying it "will" never work when it HAS worked for 14 years up untill Debian broke compatability with TK and perl!

FUCK YOU

--- fbt@??? wrote:

From: "Jack L. Frost" <fbt@???>
To: Steve Litt <slitt@???>
Cc: "dng@???" <dng@???>
Subject: Re: [Dng] About separate mailing lists
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:56:58 +0300

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:59:03AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> Devuan Weekly News XI posed the following question:
>
> ==============================================
> Talking about something else, it seems that the list is becoming
> two-fold. On one hand, it becomes concentrated on development, while
> at the same time it discusses more philosophical issues. Maybe is it
> the moment to separate into a dev list and a users list?
> ==============================================

Weighing in a bit:
Separation of a mailing list (or any other community tool) should be considered
when said tool becomes too hard to manage. dng is not even lkml yet, separating
it into several mailing lists would drastically slow discussions down and
unnecessarily split people up.


_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@???
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng




_____________________________________________________________
The Free Email with so much more!
=====> http://www.MuchoMail.com <=====