Why the hell do you laugh and make a joke of this. You people really are scum.The goal wasn't to dot every I and cross every T. The goal was to dot as many i's and as many T's one could think of in a normal Linux (UNIX LIKE LINUX) install.And that goal WAS achieved. Bastille is a great post-install script to run. Do youremeber every fucking little niggling thing you need to configure in the realm of security?Your answer to potentially having a FALSE sence of security is to ha NO SECURITY.FUCK YOU FUCK YOU!Please. Support/Package Bastille-Linux hardening tool for Devuan.Also a hardened with grsecurity kernel would be good aswell (or is that FALSE sense of security too?)You fucking clowns. Everyone can see through your conflict of interest as security contracters.A tool exists that makes it a little easier for everyone and you reject it.You know with Intel Active Management Technology in every chip (AMD has something similar, as do the ARM chipsets) how can you fucking jokes even talk about security and false senses thereof? There is no security, there are backdoors... but atleast one can TRY, and package / use WHAT OTHERS have allready created FOR YOU.Oh... but that might cut down on your consulting biz. Fuck you you frauds.Thousands have been donated to you and you've just pocketed it.--- amrset@??? wrote:From: Roy Nielsen <amrset@???>To: dng@???Subject: Re: [Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for DevuanDate: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:10:27 -0700

  
  
    I don't believe the task is impossible, I'm sure there are people
    working on such a tool and perhaps they will even open source it!

    Regards,

    -Roy

On 2/11/2015 11:01 AM, Jack L. Frost

      wrote:

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0500, Gravis wrote:


wow. congrats on being highly offensive on your very first post.

anyway, i looked at Bastille and it's a highly tweaked script and
headed toward being a decade out of date. frankly i'm not surprised
it was dropped. Linux security needs an overhaul but your bastille
script is off mark.

--Gravis


While “it's old” is not really an argument, I tend to agree that Bastille is
not something anyone should waste their time on, and that's for the simple
reason of it being a script that tries to magically make your system more
secure, which is:
1) Impossible to solve in a general sense.
2) Creating a false sense of security.
3) Hell to maintain if you actually try to accomplish the assumed goal.

Security is a delicate thing, you should never rely on magical solutions.
Instead, learn linux, learn security, implement the needed levels of security
yourself.
That, or pay an infosec specialist. Don't run magic scripts.

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@???
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng





_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@???
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
 The Free Email with so much more!=====> http://www.MuchoMail.com <=====