:: Re: [unSYSTEM] Silk Road Trial is s…
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Mike Gogulski
日付:  
To: System undo crew
題目: Re: [unSYSTEM] Silk Road Trial is starting.
Another way: Free Ross Ulbricht! Even if he's innocent!

On 02/05/2015 02:04 AM, Cody R Wilson wrote:
>
> As I've said before, I support him because of what he is accused. Not
> despite it.
>
> On Feb 4, 2015 7:02 PM, "Adam B. Levine" <adam@???
> <mailto:adam@letstalkbitcoin.com>> wrote:
>
>     Does whether or not Ross did what he is being accused of and tried
>     for, matter?

>
>     Adam B. Levine
>     Editor-in-Chief
>     Let's Talk Bitcoin! <http://www.letstalkbitcoin.com/>

>
>     On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Julia Tourianski
>     <juliatourianski@??? <mailto:juliatourianski@gmail.com>> wrote:

>
>         I watched his father breakdown on the phone with Ross's sister
>         and my world has been frozen since that moment. I cannot
>         imagine their pain even after witnessing it. His mother is
>         staying very strong, it's not over for her.

>
>         One of the jury members was smiling when they announced it.
>         I'm so disappointed in the basic nature of the common, the
>         "Justice" machine did its job today. ..

>
>         On Feb 4, 2015 5:42 PM, "Cody R Wilson" <codywilson@???
>         <mailto:codywilson@utexas.edu>> wrote:

>
>             Take heart. We knew this part was likely. We find the real
>             battle in challenging the US' acquisition of the server info.

>
>             Can't argue the facts, but we can put them to proof on the
>             law.

>
>             On Feb 4, 2015 4:40 PM, "Alicia Cruz" <accruz44@???
>             <mailto:accruz44@gmail.com>> wrote:

>
>                 :(

>
>                 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Matt
>                 <millsdmb@??? <mailto:millsdmb@gmail.com>> wrote:

>
>                     Guilty on all charges :(:(

>
>                     On Jan 23, 2015 12:49 PM, "Andrew Miller"
>                     <amiller@??? <mailto:amiller@cs.umd.edu>>
>                     wrote:

>
>                         > um by the way, did anyone notice what is
>                         happening in Puerto Rico with
>                         > the Bitcoin Foundation and that ZeroCash
>                         project, which did present at
>                         > the prior FinCrypto, is noticeably ABSENT
>                         from this upcoming one? See:
>                         > http://fc15.ifca.ai  (yeah, interesting read)

>
>                         I think your point is that because there's no
>                         research paper about
>                         Zerocash or an extension being presented at FC
>                         or the bitcoin
>                         workshop, that it might be being
>                         squelched/unwelcome somehow by the
>                         foundation influence there? That's not the
>                         case... members of the
>                         zerocash team will be there and will probably
>                         present a development
>                         update of some kind at the rump session.

>
>                         I think you're also suggesting that because
>                         the Bitcoin Foundation is
>                         a sponsor of the FC conference that it's
>                         corrupted by it's influence.
>                         I don't think that's the case... it's an
>                         academic research conference,
>                         a panel of researchers reviews (blindedly) the
>                         papers that anyone can
>                         submit, and selects the ones that are
>                         technically best. I haven't seen
>                         any evidence of corruption in this process but
>                         I'd be happy to answer
>                         any questions you have about it. This
>                         conference originated during the
>                         first crypto wars, when cryptography was on
>                         the verge becoming
>                         illegal; kowtowing to anti-privacy interested
>                         would be perverse
>                         against its culture. Also there's a session in
>                         the bitcoin workshop
>                         about (improving) Bitcoin privacy.
>                         http://fc15.ifca.ai/bitcoin/schedule.html
>                         _______________________________________________
>                         unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>                         https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>
>
>                     _______________________________________________
>                     unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>                     https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>
>
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>                 https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>             https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>         https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>     https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem