Does whether or not Ross did what he is being accused of and tried for,
matter?

Adam B. Levine
Editor-in-Chief
Let's Talk Bitcoin! <http://www.letstalkbitcoin.com/>

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Julia Tourianski <juliatourianski@???>
wrote:

> I watched his father breakdown on the phone with Ross's sister and my
> world has been frozen since that moment. I cannot imagine their pain even
> after witnessing it. His mother is staying very strong, it's not over for
> her.
>
> One of the jury members was smiling when they announced it. I'm so
> disappointed in the basic nature of the common, the "Justice" machine did
> its job today. ..
> On Feb 4, 2015 5:42 PM, "Cody R Wilson" <codywilson@???> wrote:
>
>> Take heart. We knew this part was likely. We find the real battle in
>> challenging the US' acquisition of the server info.
>>
>> Can't argue the facts, but we can put them to proof on the law.
>> On Feb 4, 2015 4:40 PM, "Alicia Cruz" <accruz44@???> wrote:
>>
>>> :(
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Matt <millsdmb@???> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Guilty on all charges :(:(
>>>> On Jan 23, 2015 12:49 PM, "Andrew Miller" <amiller@???> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > um by the way, did anyone notice what is happening in Puerto Rico
>>>>> with
>>>>> > the Bitcoin Foundation and that ZeroCash project, which did present
>>>>> at
>>>>> > the prior FinCrypto, is noticeably ABSENT from this upcoming one?
>>>>> See:
>>>>> > http://fc15.ifca.ai (yeah, interesting read)
>>>>>
>>>>> I think your point is that because there's no research paper about
>>>>> Zerocash or an extension being presented at FC or the bitcoin
>>>>> workshop, that it might be being squelched/unwelcome somehow by the
>>>>> foundation influence there? That's not the case... members of the
>>>>> zerocash team will be there and will probably present a development
>>>>> update of some kind at the rump session.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you're also suggesting that because the Bitcoin Foundation is
>>>>> a sponsor of the FC conference that it's corrupted by it's influence.
>>>>> I don't think that's the case... it's an academic research conference,
>>>>> a panel of researchers reviews (blindedly) the papers that anyone can
>>>>> submit, and selects the ones that are technically best. I haven't seen
>>>>> any evidence of corruption in this process but I'd be happy to answer
>>>>> any questions you have about it. This conference originated during the
>>>>> first crypto wars, when cryptography was on the verge becoming
>>>>> illegal; kowtowing to anti-privacy interested would be perverse
>>>>> against its culture. Also there's a session in the bitcoin workshop
>>>>> about (improving) Bitcoin privacy.
>>>>> http://fc15.ifca.ai/bitcoin/schedule.html
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>