Adam, the main travesty is the way the trial was conducted
So good question, the answer is no, it does not matter
On Feb 4, 2015 8:02 PM, "Adam B. Levine" <adam@???> wrote:
>
> Does whether or not Ross did what he is being accused of and tried for,
matter?
>
> Adam B. Levine
> Editor-in-Chief
> Let's Talk Bitcoin!
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Julia Tourianski <
juliatourianski@???> wrote:
>>
>> I watched his father breakdown on the phone with Ross's sister and my
world has been frozen since that moment. I cannot imagine their pain even
after witnessing it. His mother is staying very strong, it's not over for
her.
>>
>> One of the jury members was smiling when they announced it. I'm so
disappointed in the basic nature of the common, the "Justice" machine did
its job today. ..
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2015 5:42 PM, "Cody R Wilson" <codywilson@???> wrote:
>>>
>>> Take heart. We knew this part was likely. We find the real battle in
challenging the US' acquisition of the server info.
>>>
>>> Can't argue the facts, but we can put them to proof on the law.
>>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2015 4:40 PM, "Alicia Cruz" <accruz44@???> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> :(
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Matt <millsdmb@???> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Guilty on all charges :(:(
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 23, 2015 12:49 PM, "Andrew Miller" <amiller@???> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > um by the way, did anyone notice what is happening in Puerto Rico
with
>>>>>> > the Bitcoin Foundation and that ZeroCash project, which did
present at
>>>>>> > the prior FinCrypto, is noticeably ABSENT from this upcoming one?
See:
>>>>>> > http://fc15.ifca.ai (yeah, interesting read)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think your point is that because there's no research paper about
>>>>>> Zerocash or an extension being presented at FC or the bitcoin
>>>>>> workshop, that it might be being squelched/unwelcome somehow by the
>>>>>> foundation influence there? That's not the case... members of the
>>>>>> zerocash team will be there and will probably present a development
>>>>>> update of some kind at the rump session.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you're also suggesting that because the Bitcoin Foundation is
>>>>>> a sponsor of the FC conference that it's corrupted by it's influence.
>>>>>> I don't think that's the case... it's an academic research
conference,
>>>>>> a panel of researchers reviews (blindedly) the papers that anyone can
>>>>>> submit, and selects the ones that are technically best. I haven't
seen
>>>>>> any evidence of corruption in this process but I'd be happy to answer
>>>>>> any questions you have about it. This conference originated during
the
>>>>>> first crypto wars, when cryptography was on the verge becoming
>>>>>> illegal; kowtowing to anti-privacy interested would be perverse
>>>>>> against its culture. Also there's a session in the bitcoin workshop
>>>>>> about (improving) Bitcoin privacy.
>>>>>> http://fc15.ifca.ai/bitcoin/schedule.html
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>