I posted a list of packages in another thread. I think we should figure
out which ones are easy to recompile and set up an automated build process
to do that periodically, and parcel out the ones that aren't to people who
can patch them.

-Jude


On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Michael Dec <grepwood@???> wrote:

> On 2015-02-02 23:14, Gravis wrote:
>
>> Unless Devuan intends to drop or fork every single piece of software that
>>> decides to use systemd's facilities, it's going to be a war of attrition
>>> as
>>> things go on, no matter the arguments against systemd.
>>>
>>
>> for the vast majority of programs that depend on systemd, you can just
>> recompile programs with the flag to exclude systemd library
>> dependencies with no further effort required. the things that are
>> really intertwined with systemd are part of Gnome. patches and API
>> implementations are being made for those parts.
>> --Gravis
>>
> How many packages are we talking about? Nobody is likely to compile a
> thousand packages all on their own. Think of their poor fingers.
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>