>     You can't just switch to vdev, because many packages depend on
>     libudev. Only udev and eudev provide it.

>     eudev is the only realistic option right now, because it's a drop-in
>     replacement. Moreover, it's the only udev alternative with
>     feature-parity.

>     By the way, I'm not sure whether vdev is ready for the prime time.

>     On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:26:49 -0500
>     "Martinx - ジェームズ" <thiagocmartinsc@???
>     <mailto:thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>> wrote:

>     > Guys,
>     >
>     > I'm wondering here about what to do with `udev`, which is `systemd` in
>     > fact...

>     >
>     > What about this:

>     >

>     >
>     > 1- Rename current `udev` package to `systemd-udev`;

>     >
>     > 2- Add `vdev`;

>     >
>     > 3- Add `eudev`;

>     >
>     > 4- Add `mdev`;

>     >
>     > 4- Create a new Metapackage called `udev`, that will Depends on
>     `eudev |
>     > vdev | mdev | systemd-udev`.

>     >

>     >
>     > This will be very similar to the new `init` Metapackage on Jessie,
>     that
>     > Depends on `systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart`.

>     >
>     > What do you guys think?

>     >
>     > Also, I would like to know more about the quality of `eudev` and if it
>     > worth keeping it, since `systemd` developers will remove its "netlink"
>     > support (am I right)? Then, `systemd-udev` will depends on
>     `systemd` as
>     > PID1 in the future (through KDBUS, if I'm not wrong), making it
>     very hard
>     > to keep `eudev` up to date. Source:

>     >
>     http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019657.html

>     >
>     > I would like to evaluate `vdev` soon as possible.

>     >
>     > Best!
>     > Thiago

>     --
>     Dima Krasner <dima@??? <mailto:dima@dimakrasner.com>>

>     _______________________________________________
>     Dng mailing list
>     Dng@??? <mailto:Dng@lists.dyne.org>
>     https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng