:: Re: [Dng] What to do with udev? Som…
Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Alex 'AdUser' Z
Datum:  
To: dng
Betreff: Re: [Dng] What to do with udev? Some ideas...
Seems like it's stupid automation. See at time on first "Recieved"
header from bottom, it's different in every message.

Expecting new message in reply to that. Sorry in advance, but want to
check this.

P.S.: Maillist admin should be ready for such situations.
P.P.S.: http://m.memegen.com/dh7sw9.jpg

31.12.2014 13:54, Martinx - ジェームズ пишет:
> For God's sake, why you keep posting the very same massage over and over
> again?!
>
> Or, is that a problem with our mail list?
>
> On 27 December 2014 at 12:22, dima <dima@???
> <mailto:dima@dimakrasner.com>> wrote:
>
>     You can't just switch to vdev, because many packages depend on
>     libudev. Only udev and eudev provide it.

>
>     eudev is the only realistic option right now, because it's a drop-in
>     replacement. Moreover, it's the only udev alternative with
>     feature-parity.

>
>     By the way, I'm not sure whether vdev is ready for the prime time.

>
>     On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:26:49 -0500
>     "Martinx - ジェームズ" <thiagocmartinsc@???
>     <mailto:thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>> wrote:

>
>     > Guys,
>     >
>     > I'm wondering here about what to do with `udev`, which is `systemd` in
>     > fact...

>     >
>     > What about this:

>     >

>     >
>     > 1- Rename current `udev` package to `systemd-udev`;

>     >
>     > 2- Add `vdev`;

>     >
>     > 3- Add `eudev`;

>     >
>     > 4- Add `mdev`;

>     >
>     > 4- Create a new Metapackage called `udev`, that will Depends on
>     `eudev |
>     > vdev | mdev | systemd-udev`.

>     >

>     >
>     > This will be very similar to the new `init` Metapackage on Jessie,
>     that
>     > Depends on `systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart`.

>     >
>     > What do you guys think?

>     >
>     > Also, I would like to know more about the quality of `eudev` and if it
>     > worth keeping it, since `systemd` developers will remove its "netlink"
>     > support (am I right)? Then, `systemd-udev` will depends on
>     `systemd` as
>     > PID1 in the future (through KDBUS, if I'm not wrong), making it
>     very hard
>     > to keep `eudev` up to date. Source:

>     >
>     http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019657.html

>     >
>     > I would like to evaluate `vdev` soon as possible.

>     >
>     > Best!
>     > Thiago

>
>
>     --
>     Dima Krasner <dima@??? <mailto:dima@dimakrasner.com>>

>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Dng mailing list
>     Dng@??? <mailto:Dng@lists.dyne.org>
>     https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>