Yeah, there could be a "static-dev" package that satisfies the udev
dependency but doesn't do anything with /dev.

Jude
On Dec 26, 2014 5:12 PM, <karl@???> wrote:

> thiagocmartinsc@???:
> > I'm wondering here about what to do with `udev`, which is `systemd` in
> > fact...
> >
> > What about this:
> >
> > 1- Rename current `udev` package to `systemd-udev`;
> >
> > 2- Add `vdev`;
> >
> > 3- Add `eudev`;
> >
> > 4- Add `mdev`;
> >
> > 4- Create a new Metapackage called `udev`, that will Depends on `eudev |
> > vdev | mdev | systemd-udev`.
>
> I suggest:
>
> 5- root maintains /dev manually
>
> since a daemon for /dev isn't nessesary for a static system.
>
> Regards,
> /Karl Hammar
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Aspö Data
> Lilla Aspö 148
> S-742 94 Östhammar
> Sweden
> +46 173 140 57
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>