All text below is IMHO.

Package: pulseaudio
Version: 2.0-6.1
<...>
Depends: libasound2 (>= 1.0.24.1), libc6 (>= 2.9), libcap2 (>= 2.10),
libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), libfftw3-3, libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libice6 (>=
1:1.0.0), libltdl7 (>= 2.4.2), liborc-0.4-0 (>= 1:0.4.16), libpulse0 (=
2.0-6.1), libsamplerate0 (>= 0.1.7), libsm6, libsndfile1 (>= 1.0.20),
libspeexdsp1 (>= 1.2~beta3.2-1), libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1),
---- 1st group-------------
libsystemd-daemon0 (>= 31), libsystemd-login0 (>= 31),
===========================
---- 2nd group-------------
libudev0 (>= 146),
udev (>= 143),
===========================
--- 3rd group --------------
# sound system depends on graphics? what the hell?
libx11-6, libx11-xcb1, libxcb1, libxtst6,
===========================
libtdb1 (>= 1.2.7+git20101214),
libwebrtc-audio-processing-0,
adduser, lsb-base (>= 3.2-13), consolekit,
libasound2-plugins
Recommends: pulseaudio-module-x11, gstreamer0.10-pulseaudio, rtkit
Suggests: pulseaudio-utils, pavumeter, pavucontrol, paman, paprefs

I don't know exactly what kind of this deps, still optional or "hard".
Maybe will be enough rebuild it with proper options. But you should be
ready drop it in any moment.

> it can be a PITA

It "will be" PITA in any case, i suppose.
This project became usable mainly because you-know-who left it.

-- Alex

25.12.2014 08:45, T.J. Duchene пишет:
>
> On 12/24/2014 11:13 AM, m_maass wrote:
>> Dear Freedom lovers,
>>
>> i would suggest to you this project
>>
>> https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse
>>
>> and would say thank for your efforts.
>>
>> Cheers, and Happy Grav'Mass!
>>
> What is wrong with PulseAudio? I agree, it can be a PITA, but unless
> you are concerned about some kind of systemd dependency I do not
> understand why Devuan would be seeking a replacement. It's no worse
> than Jack or any of the other alternatives, which are less compatible.
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>