On 12/08/2014 11:30 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> On 8 December 2014 at 04:40, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> <mihamina.rakotomandimby@???> wrote:
>> On 12/06/2014 08:44 PM, mutek wrote:
>>
>> is there a very good reason why the free software world should continue to
>> stick to GTK instead to start a rational QT fork to replace GTK? (it's not
>> an obvius task of course and probably the necessary critical mass loves GTK)
>>
>>
>> I see at least one reason: bloat
>> I currently have a system with All GTK apps and no Qt.
>> I dont have to load Qt at all.
>> And I can leave: Emacs, meld, Gimp, Inkscape, LibreOffice (GTK),
>> Rednotebook,MySQL Workbench, Apache Directory Studio, PGadmin, Pidgin,...
>>
>> I already have to deal with GTK2 vs GTK3, I dont see any reason to add Qt in
>> the list.
> Apparently, GTK* have no future.

Have you got some links to ressources explicitely assuming that?
Some mainstream maintainer post declaring the projet is orphaned, for
example?

thank you