On 8 December 2014 at 04:40, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
<mihamina.rakotomandimby@???> wrote:
> On 12/06/2014 08:44 PM, mutek wrote:
>
> is there a very good reason why the free software world should continue to
> stick to GTK instead to start a rational QT fork to replace GTK? (it's not
> an obvius task of course and probably the necessary critical mass loves GTK)
>
>
> I see at least one reason: bloat
> I currently have a system with All GTK apps and no Qt.
> I dont have to load Qt at all.
> And I can leave: Emacs, meld, Gimp, Inkscape, LibreOffice (GTK),
> Rednotebook,MySQL Workbench, Apache Directory Studio, PGadmin, Pidgin,...
>
> I already have to deal with GTK2 vs GTK3, I dont see any reason to add Qt in
> the list.

Apparently, GTK* have no future.