On 12/06/2014 08:44 PM, mutek wrote:
> is there a very good reason why the free software world should
> continue to stick to GTK instead to start a rational QT fork to
> replace GTK? (it's not an obvius task of course and probably the
> necessary critical mass loves GTK)

I see at least one reason: bloat
I currently have a system with All GTK apps and no Qt.
I dont have to load Qt at all.
And I can leave: Emacs, meld, Gimp, Inkscape, LibreOffice (GTK),
Rednotebook,MySQL Workbench, Apache Directory Studio, PGadmin, Pidgin,...

I already have to deal with GTK2 vs GTK3, I dont see any reason to add
Qt in the list.