Well that is what the wiki says, my gentoo being on the Desktop I have no
need for anything more elaborate than the openrc configuration files and
ifconfig for my networking needs.
On Dec 5, 2014 8:24 PM, "chris" <chris@???> wrote:

> I quite like wicd, I'll have a quick look at if dbus is a show stopper...
>
> On 05/12/14 17:47, vladislav Ivanov wrote:
>
> My gentoo experiments indicate that you can have a perfectly good system
> without any dbus stuff, O have not bothered to install a DM, since I just
> use startx.O use openbox in place of a more sophisticate DE, libreoffice,
> Firefox and a number of other common GUI applications run OK, however we
> would need other things like a network manager, IIIRC even wicd needs that
> stuff.
> On Dec 5, 2014 7:42 PM, "Aldemir Akpinar" <aldemir.akpinar@???>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 5 Dec 2014 18:53, "Patrick Erdmann" <pe@???> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > The dbus part is the part which i understand. But what is actually the
>> benefit of using loding in comparison to pam.
>> >
>>
>> Personally I don't understand dbus part at all, for it is a wheel
>> reinvented. Unix had already solved interprocess communication by, well,
>> "interprocess communication" or aka IPC.
>> Shared memory, local sockets etc.
>>
>> Although at this stage I'm not sure whether it is feasible to write a IPC
>> wrapper to emulate dbus.
>> --
>> Aldemir
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dng mailing list
>> Dng@???
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing listDng@???https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
>