I quite like wicd, I'll have a quick look at if dbus is a show stopper...
On 05/12/14 17:47, vladislav Ivanov wrote:
>
> My gentoo experiments indicate that you can have a perfectly good
> system without any dbus stuff, O have not bothered to install a DM,
> since I just use startx.O use openbox in place of a more sophisticate
> DE, libreoffice, Firefox and a number of other common GUI
> applications run OK, however we would need other things like a network
> manager, IIIRC even wicd needs that stuff.
>
> On Dec 5, 2014 7:42 PM, "Aldemir Akpinar" <aldemir.akpinar@???
> <mailto:aldemir.akpinar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 5 Dec 2014 18:53, "Patrick Erdmann" <pe@???
> <mailto:pe@perdmann.de>> wrote:
>
> >
> > The dbus part is the part which i understand. But what is
> actually the benefit of using loding in comparison to pam.
> >
>
> Personally I don't understand dbus part at all, for it is a wheel
> reinvented. Unix had already solved interprocess communication by,
> well, "interprocess communication" or aka IPC.
> Shared memory, local sockets etc.
>
> Although at this stage I'm not sure whether it is feasible to
> write a IPC wrapper to emulate dbus.
> --
> Aldemir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@??? <mailto:Dng@lists.dyne.org>
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
::
Re: [Dng] GNOME and GDM
