Noel Torres wrote:
> On Monday, 1 de December de 2014 08:22:35 Franco Lanza escribió:
>> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:01:10AM +0100, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
>>> I meant the more pragmatic aproach: If there are peaople willing to work
>>> on systemd, they probably won't join this project. But for all fleeing
>>> systemd, it's a bit problematic to hear the talk about integrationg
>>> systemd again. It'd do the project good to place a "political" message
>>> to make things clear. It's not good to hear that maybe you'lll get
>>> backstabed by systemd again (just overstressing)
>>>
>>> Nik
>> The pragmatic approach is very symple: we are not against systemd if
>> systemd will permit us to let it to be a non-intrusive option.
>>
>> We are against ANY intrusive option, systemd or any other thing, and we
>> will NOT support any intrusive thing will arise.
>>
>> NO ONE in devuan will be forced to use systemd or any other piece of
>> intrusive shit, never.
> Just one thing that has crossed my mind:
>
> What about http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-
> latest.html ?

Besides being a HORRIBLY written specification (like, for example,
absolutely no context about what it applies to, process by which it was
developed, maintenance, .....)?

Miles Fidelman


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra