You people can continue to play cat and mouse, I'll be thinking of ways to not get the authorities involved.

As long as these sites exist, snitches will exist.

Let's maintain both?

> On Nov 10, 2014, at 4:11 AM, Dave Hollis <noagendamarket@???> wrote:
>
> i2p ?
>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd@???> wrote:
>> Yeah and he was probably the supplier of the fucking dope :(
>>
>> Has everyone forgotten Dark Alliance and the contras and the plane crashes
>> where the planes were loaded to the hilt with cocaine and always registered
>> in the name of the CIA?
>>
>> The sad fucked up version of this story is that the CIA invented drugs, then
>> used them to convert the civil rights movement into a handful of gangs which
>> they could control by controlling the dope supply. Control of gangs gave
>> them a mercenary group to get rid of anyone who got in their way because
>> "gang violence" is almost never investigated.
>> The problem was that social networks which sprung up, especially around
>> pot which was always difficult to centralize anyway and they provided a
>> troublesome social resilience. The CIA switched to using their anonymity
>> network to sell direct-to-end-user, giving them higher profit margins and
>> better Intel on who was actually using the drugs as well as keeping people
>> from knowing their neighbors.
>>
>> I'm not saying that this is what happened, I can't know, but I think it's
>> a bit arrogant to say "we can do drugs anonymously, yay fuck the government"
>> when the government created both the drugs and the anonymity network which is
>> being used to sell them.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/08/2014 11:23 PM, Mike Gogulski wrote:
>> > Later stories said that they had an undercover among the SR 2.0 founding
>> > moderators group.
>> >
>> > On 11/06/2014 05:58 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
>> >> It wasn't a backdoor in TOR, not even once <trollface>
>> >>
>> >> Seriously though, the 51% attack on TOR is (AFAIK) basically just
>> >> getting enough relays to be at every place in the path, you get
>> >> infinite tries and you only have to get lucky once and the way the
>> >> FBI has historically used small armies of infiltrators, I can't see
>> >> how this kind of network should be considered safe against a
>> >> determined adversary.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 11/06/2014 05:51 PM, Tim Patrick wrote:
>> >>> http://www.wired.com/2014/11/feds-seize-silk-road-2/
>> >>>
>> >>> I wonder how the FBI will explain how they were able to uncover the
>> >>> identity of this guy?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> >>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem