Later stories said that they had an undercover among the SR 2.0 founding
moderators group.

On 11/06/2014 05:58 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
> It wasn't a backdoor in TOR, not even once <trollface>
>
> Seriously though, the 51% attack on TOR is (AFAIK) basically just
> getting enough relays to be at every place in the path, you get
> infinite tries and you only have to get lucky once and the way the
> FBI has historically used small armies of infiltrators, I can't see
> how this kind of network should be considered safe against a
> determined adversary.
>
>
> On 11/06/2014 05:51 PM, Tim Patrick wrote:
>> http://www.wired.com/2014/11/feds-seize-silk-road-2/
>>
>> I wonder how the FBI will explain how they were able to uncover the
>> identity of this guy?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem