On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Amir Taaki <genjix@???> wrote: > depends how tox and ricochet work.
> do you know there are problems with bitmessage?
> were you following the recent starvation attacks?
> bitmessage's sole defence is pow in a flat flood fill network. we can do
> better if we want a pure p2p system resilient to attack, otherwise
> compromising with a federated system can also work well.
>
> On 11/06/2014 02:52 AM, Justus Ranvier wrote:
>> On 11/05/2014 07:21 PM, Sam Patterson wrote:
>>> Ricochet and Tox are worth looking into:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ricochet-im/ricochet >>>
>>> https://github.com/irungentoo/toxcore >>>
>>
>> If the argument for not considering Bitmessage is that it's "unproven,"
>> then doesn't that mean we should pay even less attention to Ricochet and
>> Tox?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem >>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem >