Fuck all that. If someone is going to try to use BitID or similar for
some regulatory purpose of ID, it's never something I will use for any
site. Fork whatever they do and tie the decentralization of
ident(ities) to something like stealth, zerocash, etc. ~ identity
concepts that move beyond what you think of as identity, or
"trans-identical proposals." I don't want anything to be able to ever
regulate or require how I interact with, create, or divulge (or don't)
my identities.

See, for reference:
https://forum.unsystem.net/t/interoperability-and-trans-identical-identity-decentralization-proposals-thoughts-for-review/333

Amir Taaki wrote:
> whaaaaat theee fuuuck
>
> On 10/22/2014 05:48 PM, Julia Tourianski wrote:
>> "Gifford added that the project, if successful, could demonstrate
>> how regulators and innovators can collaboratively address issues
>> for the greater global good."
>>
>> http://www.coindesk.com/20-bitcoin-companies-backing-new-deal-digital-identity/?utm_content=buffer9043b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
>>
>>
>>
:|
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> For the secrets and lies, my PGP key:
>> https://libbitcoin.dyne.org/julia_tourianski.pgp.asc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
>> list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>

- --
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn