Also,

*This philosophy more or less breaks down into garden variety
collectivism. *

Boo for contradicting the discussion with a negating declarative and no
supporting statements;

boo for not contributing to progressing the matter of property ownership
by offering an alternative viewpoint, opting instead for "nuh uh";

and most of all, *lol at thinking so highly of yourself *as to assume that
you'd completely mastered a topic which all the minds here—some of them
quite formidable—have been discussing in depth for many days, and
considering for years.

For shame, brother Pacia.

-J

On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, Chris Pacia <ctpacia@???> wrote:

>
> >
> >> "They say that private property is derived from an individual's right
> to the fruits of their labor. Since land was not created by anyone's labor,
> it cannot be rightfully owned."
>
> All property is derived from land in this sense. Indeed that's how
> economists use the term 'land'.
>
> Keep in mind nothing was ever "created" it was merely transformed. We take
> land (natural resources) and transform it into goods for our consumption.
>
> If you want to say anything that you did not create must be owned by the
> collection you are including every last thing on planet earth since nothing
> was ever "created", only transformed.
>
> This philosophy more or less breaks down into garden variety
> collectivism. _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
>