*Typo=Also BTW I've donated to Darkcoin and helped raise funds also.=Also
BTW I've donated to DarkWALLET and helped raise funds also.

On 6 October 2014 02:38, Matthew Holt <matthewholt3@???> wrote:

> Unless you're deeply invested in bitcoin then new anonymous deep web
> cryptocurrencies offer something a lot better to users demanding privacy
> and freedom from the legacy systems. There's already a new type of
> exchange that requires no registration to trade alts for BTC and
> vice-versa. So there's a quick easy route to fiat cash and also into the
> networks. While look at FairCoop <https://fair.coop/> on their plan to
> only trade with Faircoin <http://fair-coin.org/>. I've been involved
> with Bitcoin since the early Britcoin days of 2011 but I don't have large
> masses of bitcoin stashed nor do I feel like I owe it anything. If
> anything Bitcoin with its public blockchain make it ideal for the
> pro-regulation camps. And TBH the bitcoin price could really take off once
> the coin is fully regulated, but the cat is out of the bag now. And
> anonymous plus deep-web cryptocurrencies like Anoncoin and Monero are here
> now. That's where system-D monies will eventually start to head. Not to a
> permanently public bitcoin blockchain. Also I don't feel that anything
> built off or around the CoinJoin protocol could ever really offer real life
> or death anonymity, but it may make users feel better. So could help
> further the cryptocoin cause. Like Darkcoin once it's used enough it's
> going to be be playing whack-a-mole with privacy exploits for ever and a
> day IMHO. While yes these are just my opinions for whatever worth they may
> add to these discussions. Also BTW I've donated to Darkcoin and helped
> raise funds also.
>
> On 6 October 2014 01:35, Washington Sanchez <washington.sanchez@???>
> wrote:
>
>> "Whatever dude, that's just like your opinion..."
>> On 06/10/2014 7:34 AM, "Julia Tourianski" <juliatourianski@???>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> First I was censored
>>> Then it got too awkward for him, so he let me speak. This is the worst
>>> type of thinking we can encounter.
>>>
>>> "We live in the real world, you can't change reality"
>>>
>>> "When I was 20 sure I thought I could fight the government, but you have
>>> to be pragmatic"
>>>
>>> "I'm gonna quote Shakespeare, you can smile and smile but be a villain,
>>> well you can whine and whine but the reality is there needs to be
>>> regulation"
>>>
>>> "Regulation is inevitable, it had value, it's there for a reason.
>>> Everything is regulated, it's valid"
>>>
>>> "Compliance is a necessary evil"
>>>
>>> - Juan Llanos
>>>
>>> Me response
>>>
>>> https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=785756038149327
>>>
>>> - Julia Tourianski
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>