I like this analysis. Though there are likely ways to finish the piece that
interfere with forensics.

Also, I expect there to be variations of the workflows for the same files.

crw
On Oct 4, 2014 1:16 AM, "Troy Benjegerdes" <hozer@???> wrote:

> Okay, I went over-the-top with the pre-trojaned silicon stuff. I still
> think it's a big issue, but not the biggest one here.
>
> Ghostgunner is great for freedom to make stuff. But please do not
> imagine it is 'anonymous'. What about the toolmarks?
>
>
> http://www.dfs.virginia.gov/laboratory-forensic-services/firearms-toolmarks/
>
> The CNC is going to leave a LOT of evidence on which ghost gunner mill
> made which receiver in the form of tool marks. Whats worse is that since
> so few people understand tool marks, the government hired 'experts' can
> just make shit up and juries will buy it.
>
> If you really want to choke the totalstate bastards you need to provide
> some good forensic science on how to defend against fake toolmark matches.
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>