Spam detection software, running on the system "assata2", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview: Whew. I can't say I haven't considered this line of thought,
and I remain attentive to new data that may point at it again, but this is
not an Occam's razor-compatible theory, in that there are simpler theories
that explain the observations better. Or, for my more formal-maths colleagues,
I would say that proper inductive inference as described by Solomonoff will
not lead to this series of actions as the most probable cause of events.
[...]

Content analysis details: (6.8 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                            [50.171.28.216 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RBL: Relay in RNBL,
                            https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
                            [50.171.28.216 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL            SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                            See
                            http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                             for more information.
                            [URIs: dyne.org]
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 1.3 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

Whew. I can't say I haven't considered this line of thought, and I remain
attentive to new data that may point at it again, but this is not an
Occam's razor-compatible theory, in that there are simpler theories that
explain the observations better. Or, for my more formal-maths colleagues, I
would say that proper inductive inference as described by Solomonoff will
not lead to this series of actions as the most probable cause of events.

Much like the heliocentric model vs. the Copernican, it is probable that
there are less sophisticated actions in the mix. In this case we cannot
quite know, but I will act as rationally as I can using the proper methods
for inference, in any case.

—J

On Monday, September 1, 2014, n <nt0n0m@???> wrote:

> If the Heroic offer to Help Assange is the only defence in your eyes, here
> is something to read & consider :
>
> Iron Truth # 1 : The mission of the Global MSM is to steer the peoples’
> thoughts and opinions in the direction desired by the ruling class.
>
> Iron Truth # 2 : The MSM would NEVER hype a story, or an individual, that
> poses a true threat to the ruling class which it serves. Remember the
> silent treatment given to Ron Paul?
>
> Iron Truth # 3 : When all of the MSM start pushing/hyping the same given
> narrative, of any given issue, all at the same time, understand that the
> ruling class is selling you something!
>
> April 2010 / Wikileaks Bursts Onto The World Stage
>
> In April 2010, Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks publishes graphic gunsight
> footage from a 3 year old Baghdad airstrike in which Iraqi journalists were
> murdered by a U.S. helicopter. Though these types of incidents were already
> well known, the MSM treats the video as if it is the breaking story of the
> century!
>
> The release of a video, showing Iraqis being murdered, gave WikiLeaks
> credibility as a whistle-blowing operation.
>
> 2010 – 2011 / Wikileaks Releases More Documents
>
> A good con-man must win the people’s confidence before he makes his sting.
> By exposing a certain amount of wasteful military spending and U.S.
> brutality (limited hangout), Assange’s WikiLeaks wins the trust of many
> liberty loving, justice seeking Americans, as well as Europeans and Arabs.
> He is also condemned by certain U.S. politicians & journalists. This
> condemnation (some of it feigned, some of it genuine) is known in
> intelligence circles as “sheep-dipping”, and also serves to build his
> credibility.
>
> The MSM makes an instant international super-star of the shady Austrailian
> Assange!
>
> Late 2010 – 2011 / Wikileaks Switches Gears!
>
> After gaining the world’s trust with his controlled attacks against the
> U.S. government, Assange, a CIA (and/or Mossad) operative, aims his
> WikiLeaks whistle-blowing weapon at the true intended targets. Leaked
> documents no longer embarass America. But very damaging information about
> corruption within the governments of Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen are “leaked”
> to “assets” within the Arab press.
>

>     GOOGLE: WIKILEAKS YEMEN
>     GOOGLE: WIKILEAKS EGYPT
>     GOOGLE: WIKILEAKS TUNISIA

>
> Leaks aimed at embarrassing Syria and Algeria are also released.
>

>     GOOGLE: WIKILEAKS SYRIA
>     GOOGLE: WIKILEAKS ALGERIA

>
> Wasn’t the original mission of WikiLeaks to expose U.S. aggression and
> oppression in the Middle East? Why did Assange suddenly target certain Arab
> states?
>
> This con-game is a classic “bait & switch” scheme.
>
> 2011 / “Arab Spring” Topples Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen & Libya – War Also
> Breaks Out In Syria – Wikileaks Claims Credit!
>
> What a coincidence! All of the governments targeted byAssange’s WikiLeaks
> become victims of the “Arab Spring”.
>
> The MSM Fairy Tale tells us that the “Arab Spring” was a “spontaneous”
> uprising of the people, that started in Tunisia, and later spread to other
> nations. The reality is that the Globalist Axis had targeted certain
> governments for regime change. They also seek to crush any state that
> either dares to assert some degree of independence, or that gets to chummy
> with Russia and/or China. The formula for conducting “regime change” within
> the targeted states is as follows:
>
> Step 1: Assange’s WikiLeaks feeds very embarassing leaks to “assets”
> within the Arab press.
>
> Step 2: The targeted regime suddenly becomes very unpopular.
>
> Step 3: Internal subversives (provacateurs) kick off the “spontaneous
> demonstrations”.
>
> Step 4: Ordinary citizens swell the ranks of the protestors.
>
> Step 5: Paid traitors within the government and military force the
> government to resign. Step 5a: (In Libya & Syria, paid terrorist
> mercenaries (“rebels”) fight against the loyal military.)
>
> Step 6: The MSM then claims that “people power” has triumphed over tyranny.
>
> Phony Arab Spring! Time named “The Protester” as 2011 “Person of the Year”.
> Business Insider: Julian Assange Says He Planned Arab Spring
>
> The Guardian (UK): Amnesty International hails WikiLeaks and Guardian as
> Arab spring ‘catalysts’
>
> (The Guardian is the same newspaper now working with “whistle-blower”
> Edward Snowden!)
> Wikileaks Targets Russia’s Putin, And His Close Personal Friend,
> Berlusconi Of Italy
>
> The world government pushers hate Putin of Russia. Not only is mighty
> Russia refusing to hand over its sovereignty to this Gang, but Putin is
> blocking the much anticipated war against Syria and Iran. So it comes as no
> surprise that WikiLeaks has also leaked on Putin, and his close personal
> friend, Silvio Berluconi of Italy.
>
> Putin remains as strong as ever, but Berlusconi was removed from office
> after Wikileaks ruined him.
>

>     GOOGLE: WIKILEAKS PUTIN
>     GOOGLE” WIKILEAKS BERLUSCONI

>
> With the loss of his vacation buddy Berlusconi (thanks to WikiLeaks),
> Putin lost his only true friend in Western Europe.
>
> Putin & Berlusconi are close friends.
>
> So, there it is.
>
> The “heroic” whistle-blower / leaker Julian Assange, with the help of the
> MSM, suckers in the entire world with his “anti-American / anti-war” leaks.
> He then uses this “street-cred” to attack the rivals of the U.S. / Israel /
> NATO Axis of Evil, setting the Middle East on fire in the process.
> Wikileaks represents the most brilliant psy-op since the 9/11 attacks
> (brought to you by the same planners!)
>
> For its audacity, ingenuity, and destructive power, it will be hard to top
> Julian Assange.
>
> …………………Enter, Mr. Edward Snowden.
>
> Summer 2013 / Msm Drops The Edward Snowden Hype-Bomb Upon The World!
>
> In a sudden media blitz roll out, eerily similar to that of Julian
> Assange, a Mr. Edward Snowden is introduced to the world as another
> “heroic” whistle-blower. The vehicle which Snowden uses to expose
> government wrong doing is a lawyer-turned-journalist named Glen Greenwald
> of The Guardian Newspaper (UK) – the same newspaper that PROUDLY boasts of
> its role in bringing about the “Arab Spring”!
>
> Exactly as was the case with Assange, Snowden’s revelations of NSA spying
> upon the public amount to all hype and no substance. It is already well
> known that the NSA can listen to phone calls and read E-mails!
>
> Exactly as was the case with Assange, Snowden becomes a “fugitive”. No
> explanation is given as to how he managed to escape, or how a fugitive was
> able to get on a plane. Snowden flees to CIA-infested Hong Kong where his
> “cause” is supported by a bizarre instant flash-mob equipped with
> professionally made bi-lingual banners and picket signs!
>
> Exactly as was the case with Assange, Snowden becomes an international
> star.
>
> Exactly as was the case with Assange, Snowden (and Greenwald) are
> cleverly, and theatrically condemned (sheep-dipped) by certain hated
> Americans (Diane Feinstein, Donald Trump, George Bush I (an ex CIA
> Director))
>
> A sure sign of fakery. Professional banners and posters pop up instantly
> throughout Hong Kong.
>
> Instant ‘pro-Snowden’ Flash Mobs, with printed signs, pop up in western
> influenced Hong Kong.
>
> Glen Greenwald and the odious David Gregory stage a controlled spat on
> NBC’s “Meet The Press” – Greenwald’s “sheep-dipping” as an
> “anti-Establishment”, crusading journalist is now complete.
>
> Snowden, Holed Up In Moscow Airport, Is In Contact With Julian Assange!
>
> If Assange himself is a fugitive, how does he manage to stay in the
> spotlight? How did Snowden come in contact with him? We read in the July 6
> USA Today:
>
> “Assange, who once published thousands of illegally obtained U.S.
> government diplomatic communications on his website, acknowledged Monday
> that he is coordinating efforts to help National Security Agency (NSA)
> leaker Edward Snowden evade U.S. justice.”
>
> SAY WHAT?!
>
> Is Julian Assange some sort of international King-Pin that he can
> “coordinate efforts” – across continents – to help a fugitive, while he
> himself is a fugitive? We have already suggested that Assange is a fake.
> The fact that Snowden is hooked up with him pretty much tells us all we
> need to know about him as well…….But there is more!
>
> Excerpt from the Daily Beast:
>
> “As the U.S. government presses Moscow to extradite former National
> Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, America’s most wanted leaker has
> a plan B. The former NSA systems administrator has already given encoded
> files containing an archive of the secrets he lifted from his old employer
> to several people.”
>
> Exactly like Assange, Snowden has files to release. It is evident that
> these files contain damaging information. Who is the target this time?
> Foreign governments? American officials? How does an government contractor
> just walk out with so many files? Why would this young man destroy his
> life, defying the Feds and condemning himself to fugitive status – just to
> tell us what we already knew? Oh, that’s right….he is a “hero” and a
> “patriot”.
>
> Can you smell the Hollywood BS?
>
> If anyone here thinks this is not possible, then please watch this video
> https://forum.unsystem.net/t/jacob-applebaum-to-protect-infect/306
> & realize incredible level of sophistication we are dealing with here.
> To think those who are in positions of power are just good'ol boys like
> you & I is to completely
> miss the boat here. Those who steer global events are psychopathic & NOT
> like you & I.
>
> Also this video is of great importance
>
>
> http://itccs.org/2014/08/17/breaking-interview-child-sacrifice-in-montreal-disrupted-arrests-made/
>
> Please WATCH the above & consider the implications.
> This is what UNsystem means.
>
> Thanks,
>
> N
>
>
>
> On lun, sep 1, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Jaromil <jaromil@???
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jaromil@???');>> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014, Amir Taaki wrote:
>
> Thank you. Good to know.
>
> these are all points of view, I wouldn't take Marco's account as a source
> of ultimate information. I also don't think he is lying to discredit
> Ecuador, because a monopoly on violence will always have such flaws. Yet,
> out of naivite' I think the move they have made in Ecuador with the Banco
> central and the next move with Banco del Sur is moving the geopolitical
> axis big time, ruling the US/EU egemony out of certain new financial pipes
> being formed in the south of the world. Will this affect our freedom?
> hardly. But it is fashinating and it does not have necessarily to be
> liquidated just because, obviously, all presidents in chief of a military
> army are shit no matter what. The narrative is that of liberation from
> colonialism of the central bank of Ecuador and is a bold move without many
> precedents (maybe just Iceland): they did kick out World Bank and IMF thugs
> and now look at new constituencies. All this is being criticised enough by
> the WSJ and NYT to the point I suggest we wait and see without too many
> prejudices and separating clearly the narrative of big state powers from
> that of emergent constituencies that start also within those systems. At
> last, I have met the Ecuadorian vice-minister to development 2 days ago in
> BXL and talked extensively about these issues. Believe me when I say they
> know what they are doing, but yes the view is that of a centralized bank -
> which for the first time in the history of its genre is working to *change*
> things, rather than keeping them the same as every other central bank ever
> did. ciao
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing list:
> http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>