Lol. What's a libertarian, according to the Guardian and their study? I'm
not going to google it because both sides are equally foolish, but on a
more conservative-leaning site I saw, not more than a few months ago, an
article written about an article that showed that "libertarians" had a
*greater* grasp of science than "liberals" (US-type, both, obviously).

So much like eggs, then. Science proves they're bad! Science proves they're
not bad! All that tells me is that somewhere, science stopped being
scientific.


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Charlotte Bowyer <charlotte@???>
wrote:

> The examples the article gives regard policy, not science...
> "Libertarians don't like the FDA'
> - THEY HATE SCIENCE
>
> And the idea that it's free markets incentivising giant healthcare
> corporations not to create new drugs... yup....
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Tim Patrick <judoman589@???>
> wrote:
>

>> Remember folks, the free market and science can't go hand in hand...
>> Except for Bitcoin, SpaceX, Tesla, 3d printers, etc...       Link:
>> http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2014/aug/29/libertarian-ideology-natural-enemy-science
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Charlotte Bowyer*
> *Head of Digital Policy*
> Adam Smith Institute,
> 23 Great Smith St,
> London SW1P 3DJ
>
> Web: www.adamsmith.org
> Tel: 0207 222 4995
> Mob: 07968188340
> Twtr:@EileenSpalding
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>