I am familiar with stephan's work. there are holes in it. just like with
the non-agression principle. but this is not a debate to have here :)

anyway, to answer your question, no that is not what I meant. i
specifically meant exactly and only what I stated









For the secrets and lies, my PGP key:
https://libbitcoin.dyne.org/julia_tourianski.pgp.asc


On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@???>
wrote:

> On 08/24/2014 01:38 PM, Julia Tourianski wrote:
> > you can't compare the objective reality of gravity to human interaction
> and
> > questions like right and wrong.
>
> If by that you mean that ethics are subjective, then I disagree in the
> strongest possible terms.
>
> https://freedomainradio.com/free/#upb
>
> Quick summary:
>
> 1. Ethical assertions are one way people try to influence the behavior
> of other people.
>
> 2. Ethical statements differ from other ways of persuasion because
> rather than appealing to personal preference they implicitly claim to
> derive their validity from universal principals.
>
> 3. We can test ethical statements by identifying the universal principle
> they represent. If the principle can not be applied universally or is
> logically contradictory, then it's false.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>