Note the quotation marks. I used them to indicate the use of the
colloquialism.

However, there is an objective ideal path, at least as can be proven within
the context of our own universe. We cannot know, at present, about anything
outside ours, and so cannot know if the state of these unknowns would
indicate different "ideal" path. But anyway, since it's come up, when I
speak of "right" I mean that which aligns with the ideal.
On Aug 24, 2014 8:24 AM, "nt0n0m" <nt0n0m@???> wrote:

> I was just going to try & not throw my 2 cents in...
> but a few days later it pops in my head & I do feel it's important...
>
> On 14-08-21 04:29 PM, Josh Walker wrote:
>
> My belief system is that this is the method through which we achieve
>> consensus about "right/wrong"
>>
>> I would suggest to the wonderful people on this list, that right & wrong
> are *not* decided by us.
> Any more than day & night are decided by us.
> They are built right into the fabric of existence.
>
> Consider this: If we could define right & wrong through consensus, would
> this not mean that the Iraq "war" of the last decade or whatev. was "Right"
> since the majority of the population believed it was ?
>
> If reality is Objective, and it is... What people may or may not believe
> is irrelevant.
> Not believing in gravity does nothing to nullify it's effects on the
> non-believer...
>
> Much respect, (not trying to be a prick here)
>
>
>
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net https://mailinglists.dyne.org/
>> cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>